
The journal adheres to the principles of academic integrity and high standards of publication ethics at all stages of the editorial process, including manuscript submission, peer review, editorial consideration, and publication.
The journal’s editorial policy is based on international standards of scholarly publishing, in particular the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are screened for textual similarity using the iThenticate system.
The journal does not tolerate the following forms of academic misconduct:
The journal strictly prohibits any form of citation manipulation by authors, editors, or reviewers.
The Editorial Board carries out internal monitoring of possible abnormal citation patterns, including:
The journal does not allow the practice of reviewer citation manipulation, when a reviewer requests that the author add citations to the reviewer’s own publications without proper scholarly justification.
The Editorial Board examines such recommendations and may reject unjustified requests to add references.
Authors, readers, or other interested parties may submit a complaint regarding suspected plagiarism to the journal’s Editorial Board by email.
A complaint should include:
Plagiarism complaints are reviewed using the COPE principles.
The Editorial Board may make one of the following decisions:
If the author fails to respond within the time period specified by the Editorial Board, or if the explanation provided is unsatisfactory, the Editorial Board may decide to retract the article.
The authors of each article bear full responsibility for the content of their publications. The Editorial Board of the journal and the publisher are not responsible for any consequences arising from the use of information published in the journal.